Friday May 18, 2012
Login
 |
ACCFocus. ACC claimants support network :: File Repository
RSS
Legal Arguments
RSS
Brightwell--vs-ACC
- Short Description:
- Practice and procedure —Production of documents for inspection —Claim of public interest immunityfor documents of the Accident Compensation Cor...
- File Size:
- 174.3 KB
Buckland Vs ACC
- Short Description:
- The appellant suffered a back injury on 15 May 1986 and was paid weekly compensation until August 1986 when his medical certificate expired and his...
- File Size:
- 21.8 KB
Chalecki Vs ACC
- Short Description:
- The District Court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal relating to a Code complaint, be it a complaint which is legitimate under the Code, or one such as this appellant has, a complaint against the Corporation but which is not a Code complaint.
- File Size:
- 22.06 Kb
Criglington vs ACC
- Short Description:
- Late application for Review. Extenuating circumstances
- File Size:
- 168.65 Kb
Discretion submission of J. Huntley
- Short Description:
- Discretion submission of J. Huntley
- File Size:
- 45.6 KB
Eason Vs ACC
- Short Description:
- Appeal pursuant sec. 91/1992 act... "Res Judicata"
- File Size:
- 30.4 KB
Elliston Vs ACC
- Short Description:
- Application for leave to appeal denied for want of jurisdiction.
- File Size:
- 10.3 KB
Garven Vs ACC 91/2007
- Short Description:
- The applicant has made application for Leave to Appeal to the High Court from the decision of His Honour Judge J D Hole, delivered on 15 September 2004. The applicant was the unsuccessful appellant in that appeal.
- File Size:
- 77.1 KB
Hamilton Vs ACC
- Short Description:
- There are two decisions of the respondent ("the Corporation") at issue. On 16 August 2001 the Corporation raised an overpayment of $65,984.11 for the period 29 February 1992 to 12 December 2000, on the basis that compensation had been miscalculated when the appellant was incorrectly assessed as "self employed".
- File Size:
- 113.6 KB
Harris vs ACC
- Short Description:
- The issue is whether a review decision by Miss Clark dated 3 October 2002 which held that jurisdiction was declined on the basis that the appellant’s application for review was lodged out of time, is correct.
- File Size:
- 19.63 Kb
